Peace conceptualizations: From Galtung to Sen and beyond

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58508/cultpaz.v8.236

Keywords:

Galtung' peace; re-conceptualizing peace; conflict; complexity

Abstract

The international academic debate on "peace" has been articulated in different ways, but initially and for a long time remained focused on an idea of peace that was essentially seen as the absence of war ("negative" peace). In the field of Peace Studies, attention has gradually shifted to a broader conceptualization of peace, known as "positive" peace. Galtung's notion of 'positive' peace, despite its good intentions, is in fact quite problematic. In this article, I first analyze Galtung's seminal contributions on the conceptualization of peace, underlying its shortcomings. Drawing on a re-conceptualization of peace as an asymptotic process of "construction of", that is, a tension towards a horizon which we can imagine but never fully achieve, I then propose a rethinking of conflict, outside the logics of containment, elimination or transformation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amietta, P. L. (1991). La creatività come necessità: Il nuovo manager tra creazione, complessità e carisma. Etas.

Bartolucci, V. & G. Gallo (2022). La pace come utopia necessaria. Scienza e Pace, 13 (2), pp. 65-86, https://doi.org/10.13131/unipi/q241-ft94.

Bartolucci, V. & G. Gallo (2023). Ripensare la pace. Scienza e Pace, 14 (2), pp. 1-24.

Bernstein, B. J. (1975). Roosevelt, Truman, and the Atomic Bomb, 1941-1945: A Reinterpretation. Political Science Quarterly, 90(1), pp. 23-69, https://doi.org/10.2307/2148698.

Bianchi, E. e A.A.V.V. (1991), La Pace: dono e profezia, Edizioni Quiqajon.

Boulding, K. E. (1977). Twelve friendly quarrels with Johan Galtung. Journal of Peace Research, 14(1), pp. 75–86, https://doi.org/10.1177/002234337701400105.

Brock-Utne, B. & G. Garbo (2009). Language is power. In B. Brock-Utne & G. Garbo (eds.) Language and Power: The Implications of Language for Peace and Development (pp. 1-31). Mkuki na Nyota.

Campbell, S. P., M. G. Findley & K. Kikuta (2017). An Ontology of Peace: Landscapes of Conflict and Cooperation with Application to Colombia. International Studies Review, 19 (1), pp. 92-113, https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/vix005.

Carroll, B. A. (1972). Peace research – Cult of power. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 16(4), pp. 585–616, https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002772016004.

Chandler, D. (2000). Bosnia: Faking Democracy after Dayton. Pluto.

Cohen, B. (1997). The edge of chaos. Financial booms, bubbles, crashes and chaos. Wiley.

Cooper, N. R. (2007). Review Article: On the crisis of the liberal peace. Conflict, Security and Development, 7(4), pp. 605–616, https://doi.org/10.1080/14678800701693025.

Crighton, M. l. (2012). The Lost World. Ballantine Books.

Davenport, C., E, Melander & P. M. Regan (2018). The Peace Continuum: What It Is and How to Study It. Oxford University Press.

Diehl, P. F. (2016). Exploring Peace: Looking Beyond War and Negative Peace. International Studies Quarterly, 60, pp. 1–10.

Diehl, P. F., G. Goertz & Y. Gallegos (2021). Peace data: Concept, measurement, patterns, and research agenda. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 38(5), pp. 605-624.

Duffield, M. (2001). Global Governance and the New Wars. Zed.

Gaddis, J. (1987). The long peace: Inquiries into the history of the Cold War. Oxford University Press.

Galtung, J. (1964). An editorial. What is peace research? Journal of Peace Research, 1(1), pp. 1–4.

Galtung, J. (1969). Violence, Peace, and Peace Research. Journal of Peace Research, 6, pp. 167-191.

Galtung, J. (1985). Twenty-five years of Peace Research: Ten challenges and some responses. Journal of Peace Research, 22 (2), pp. 141-158.

Galtung, J. (1990). Cultural Violence. Journal of Peace Research, 27, pp. 291-305.

Galtung, J. (2009). (Interview) Johan Galtung – fredsrabulist i femti år [Johan Galtung – Peace agitator for fifty years]. Perspektiv, (3), 40–47.

Galtung, J., Fischer, D., & Fischer, D. (2013). Johan Galtung: Pioneer of peace research (Vol. 5). Springer.

Gibler, D. (2012). The Territorial Peace. Cambridge University Press.

Gleditsch, N. P., J. Nordkavelle & H. Strand (2014). Peace Research—Just the Study of War? Journal of Peace Research, 51(2), pp. 145–58.

Goertz, G. (2020). Social science concepts: A user’s guide (2nd ed.). Princeton University Press.

Goldstein, J. (2011). Winning the War on War: The Decline of Armed Conflict Worldwide. Dutton.

Guarrieri, T., R. A. Cooper Drury & A. Murdie (2017). Introduction: Exploring Peace. International Studies Review, 19 (1), pp. 1–5.

Höglund, K. & M. Söderberg Kovacs (2010). Beyond the absence of war: The diversity of peace in post-settlement societies. Review of International Studies 36(2), pp. 367–390.

Johansen, J. (2006). Peace research needs to reorient. In A. Hunter (ed.), Peace Studies in the Chinese Century (pp. 31–38 ). Ashgate.

Joshi, M. & P. Wallensteen (eds.), (2018). Understanding quality peace: Peacebuilding after civil war. Routledge.

Kant, I. (1795). Perpetual Peace: A Philospphical Essay. George Allen & Unwin Ltd.

Korf, B. (2006). Cargo Cult Science, Armchair Empiricism, and the Idea of Violent Conflict. Third World Quarterly, 27 (3), pp. 459–76.

Mac Ginty, R. (2006). No War, No Peace: The Rejuvenation of Stalled Peace Processes and Peace Accords, Rethinking Peace and Conflict Studies. Palgrave Macmillan.

Mac Ginty, R. & O. Richmond (2013). The Local Turn in Peace Building: A Critical Agenda for Peace. Third World Quarterly, 34 (5), pp. 763–783.

Neufeld, B. (1993). The Marginalisation of Peace Research in International Relations. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 22(2), pp. 165–184.

Nobel, P. (2001). Alfred Bernhard Nobel and the Peace Prize. International Review of the Red Cross, 83(842), pp. 259-273.

Oneal, J. R., H. Frances, Z. Maoz & B. Russett (1996). The Liberal Peace: Interdependence, Democracy, and International Conflict, 1950–85. Journal of Peace Research, 33(1), pp. 11–28.

Paris, R. (2004). At War’s End: Building Peace after Civil Conflict. Cambridge University Press.

Pinker, S. (2011). The Better Angels of Our Nature: Why Violence Has Declined. Viking.

Rasmussen, M. V. (2003). The West, Civil Society, and the Construction of Peace. Palgrave.

Richmond, O. P. (2005). The Transformation of Peace. Palgrave.

Richmond, O. P. (2006). Patterns of Peace. Global Society, 20(4), pp. 367-394.

Richmond, O. P. (2008). Peace in International Relations. Routledge.

Russett, B. & J. Oneal (2001). Triangulating peace: Democracy, interdependence, and international organizations. W. W. Norton.

Schneider, G. & N. P. Gleditsch (2010). The Capitalist Peace: The Origins and Prospects of a Liberal Idea. International Interactions, 36(2), pp. 107–14.

Sen, A. (1990). Development as Freedom. Oxford University Press.

Sen, A. (2007). Identity and Violence: The Illusion of Destiny. W. W. Norton.

Söderström, J. & E. Olivius (2022). Pluralism, temporality, and affect – methodological challenges of making peace researchable. Conflict, Security, and Development, 22(5), pp. 411–433.

Svensson, I. (2020). Emancipation and critique in peace and conflict research. Journal of Global Security Studies, 5(4), pp. 703–707.

Waldrop, M. M. (1996). Complessità: Uomini e idee al confine tra ordine e caos. Instar Libri [original: Complexity: the emerging science at the edge of order and chaos, 1992), Simon & Shuster].

Wallensteen, P. (1988). The origins of peace research. In P. Wallensteen (ed.) Peace Research: Achievements and Challenges (p. 7–29). Westview.

Wallensteen, P. (2015). Quality Peace: Peacebuilding, Victory and World Order. Oxford University Press.

Waltz, K. (1979). Theory of International Politics. Addison Wesley.

Weber, T. K. (2004). J. Galtung: Peace Research moves beyond war. In Weber, T. K. (ed.), Gandhi as disciple and mentor (pp. 203-217). Cambridge University Press.

Zaum, D. (2012). Beyond the 'liberal peace'. Global Governance, 18.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-31

How to Cite

Bartolucci, V. (2024). Peace conceptualizations: From Galtung to Sen and beyond. Revista De Cultura De Paz, 8, 268–283. https://doi.org/10.58508/cultpaz.v8.236

Issue

Vol. 8 (2024)

Section

Johan Galtung: between scientific commitment and civil passion

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Valentina Bartolucci

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Aquellos autores/as que tengan publicaciones con esta revista, aceptan los términos siguientes: 

  1. Los autores/as conservarán sus derechos de autor y garantizarán a la revista el derecho de primera publicación de su obra, el cuál estará simultáneamente sujeto a la Licencia de reconocimiento de Creative Commons 4.0 BY-NC-SA que permite a terceros compartir la obra siempre que se indique su autor y su primera publicación esta revista.
  2. Los autores/as podrán adoptar otros acuerdos de licencia no exclusiva de distribución de la versión de la obra publicada (p. ej.: depositarla en un archivo telemático institucional o publicarla en un volumen monográfico) siempre que se indique la publicación inicial en esta revista.
  3. Se permite y recomienda a los autores/as difundir su obra a través de Internet (p. ej.: en archivos telemáticos institucionales o en su página web) antes y durante el proceso de envío, lo cual puede producir intercambios interesantes y aumentar las citas de la obra publicada. (Véase El efecto del acceso abierto).

  4. Los autores han respetado la política de autoría de esta revista.